SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 742

SHANTANU KEMKAR
Lakshmi Nagdev – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Kumar Nagdev – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SINGH, Alok Aradhe,

Judgment

( 1. ) BY filing this petition under Section 23 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as cpc) the petitioner wife is seeking transfer of Matrimonial Suit No. 17-A/04 filed by the respondent husband in the Court of III Additional District Judge, Katni to the Court of competent jurisdiction in District Durg in the State of Chhattisgarh.

( 2. ) IN short the petitioners case is that her parents arc old and infirm and her brother who is a business man in unable to accompany her to attend the case pending at Kalni. Petitioner has a son aged about two years and there is no-one to lookafter him. The petitioner is residing at Bhilai, District Durg which is more than 465 kms away from Katni. In the aforesaid circumstances it is difficult for her to attend the matrimonial case filed by the respondent at Katni.

( 3. ) THE respondent opposed the prayer on the grounds that- (i) the petitioner approached this Court after a considerable delay, (ii) the Trial Court vide order dated 28-4-2004 apart from maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 10,000/for travelling expenses of the petitioner which the respondent has deposited















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top