SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 207

S.A.NAQVI
DINESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.Rathore, ANIL MISHRA,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS revision petition is preferred against order dated 18-1-1999 in Cr. Revision No. 65 of 1998 whereby, quashing order passed in Cr. Case No. 80 of 1997 pending before JMFC, Distt. Shivpuri.

( 2. ) NON-APPLICANT P. Vijaykumar filed a private complaint against applicant Dr. Dinesh Sharma under Section 500, 166, 167, 186, 189, 192, 193, 197,198,199,504 and 506 of IPC. After preliminary enquiry, learned Trial Court registered private complaint under Sections 166,167,189,199 and 506 of IPC. This private complaint was pertaining to a letter written by applicant to non-applicant which he feels defamatory and has filed private complaint. After service of summons, applicant Dr. Dinesh Sharma appeared before learned trial Court. He filed an application under Section 197 of Cr. P. C. that without sanction for prosecution, Court cannot take cognizance. Learned Trial Court allowed this application and discharged applicant from above said charges. ( 3. ) AGAINST the order of Trial Court, non-applicant P. Vijaykumar filed a criminal case bearing No. 65 of 1998 and by the impugned order, learned revisional Court allowed revision petition and set-aside Trial Courts order and direct



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top