SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 769

S.K.GANGELE
DESHRAJ SINGH PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAM BABU AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Gupta, K.N.Gupta, N.K.Gupta, S.K.JAIN, S.S.BANSAL,

Judgment

( 1. ) THIS first appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil

procedure by the appellants-plaintiffs against the judgment and decree dated 15-10-2004, passed by the First Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Suit no. 03-A/2001.

( 2. ) THE plaintiffs filed a suit in representative capacity under Order 1 rule 8 of Civil Procedure Code for declaration and permanent injunction. They pleaded that the temple of Hanumanji, Shivji, Parvatiji, Ganeshji, Nadiyaji and bharonji, is situated at Indore Balon Ka Bada, Dal Bazar, Lashkar, Gwalior. The temple is hundred years old. An open space is also available around the temple. Number of persons used to come to worship at the temple. However, the defendant is trying to raise a construction over the place of temple. He is also trying to destroy the temple and convert the place of temple in a private property. The defendant No. 1, has an intention to construct a godown in place of temple. Initially, Rambabu Agarwal was added as defendant No. 1 and, subsequently, two other persons, namely, Mr. Balkishan and Ayodhya Mandir trust has been added as defendants. During pendency of suit, Rameshwar dayal, who is original plain































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top