SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 559

S.K.GANGELE
VIMAL MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA GOPAL SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Gupta, P.K.PATNI, Prakhar Dhengula,

Judgment

( 1. ) APPELLANT/non-APPLICANT has filed this appeal against the order dated ; 8-3-2002, passed by III rd Additional District Judge, Shivpuri in Probate Case no. 7/2000. Applicant filed an application for probate under Sections 218 and 254 of the Indian Succession Act. He pleaded that his uncle Chhotelal Sharma executed a "will" on 16-3-1995 and by the aforesaid "will" he had bequeathed admeasuring 1. 89 hectare of land situated at Village Kota, Pargana and District shivpuri in favour of the applicant because the applicant had been living with his uncle. It is an admitted fact that the non-applicant is the daughter of the deceased. Non-applicant resisted the claim of the applicant. She further stated that her father has not executed any "will" in favour of the applicant. The said "will" (Exh. P-l) is a forged one. After considering the evidence on record of the case, the Trial Court granted probate in favour of the applicant by holding that will executed in favour of the applicant is proper.

( 2. ) LEARNED Senior Counsel on behalf of the appellant/non-applicant has submitted that the Trial Court has committed an error of law in granting probate in favour of the respondent. T

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top