SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(MP) 117

SHIV DAYAL
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
JHAM SINGH SOBHARAM LODHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Tare, R.C.Rai,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE only grievance in this revision is that the trial Court has erred in refusing to decide as preliminary issues four additional issues, which were framed on the defendants application dated December 6, 1974. These issues are:-

" (1) Whether the Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit ? (2) Whether the suit is time barred ? (3) Whether the suit is not properly valued ? Its effect. (4) Whether the plaintiff has failed to comply with the requirements of section 80, civil Procedure Code ? Its effect. "

These issues having been framed by the trial Court, the defendants requested the Court to try them as preliminary issues. By order dated January 13, 1975, the trial Court rejected that request with the observation that these issues would also be determined along with the other issues. The reason stated in the order is that on July 15, 1970, the parties had requested the Court to determine the preliminary issues along with other issues.

( 2. ) SHRI Tares contention is that the order of the trial Court is, on the face of it, erroneous inasmuch as the question of the parties agreement could not arise on July 15, 1970, regarding the issues which were framed subsequently, i.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top