SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 13

H.G.MISHRA
CHHITOO HIRAJEE – Appellant
Versus
SAKHARAM UMDU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K.Sanghi, R.G.Waghmare, R.R.Waghmare, S.D.Sanghi,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS revision by the plaintiffs Chhitoo and his sons is against the order dated 16-3-1977, whereby the learned Additional District Judge, mandleshwar, has affirmed the order passed by the trial Court dated 7-12-1976, whereby the learned trial Judge rejected their application for issuance of a temporary injunction against defendant-non-applicants and allowed the application submitted by the defendant-non-applicants for issuance of a temporary injunction against the plaintiff-applicants.

( 2. ) THE facts material For the decision of this revision are as under: The plaintiff-applicants herein have brought the suit for declaration of their title and for issuance of a permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land situated in village Rawat-Pipliya, Tahsil Barwaha, on the allegations that they are Bhumiswamis in possession of the land in suit and that the defendant-non-applicants threatened to dispossess them. In the suit, the plaintiff-applicants submitted an application for issuance of a temporary injunction against the defendant-non-applicants on the ground that they want to dispossess them (the plaintiffs) by taking the law into their hands and that if interim i

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top