SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 106

P.C.PATHAK
Jagdish Chandra Makhija – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Jain, RAJENDRA SINGH, Ramesh Shukla, U.K.Sharma,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE appellant, a Senior Geohydrologist (Executive Engineer) in Ground Water Survey Department of State of M. P. , posted at Khandwa, was convicted under section 5 (2) read with section 5 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinater called the Act) and under section 161, Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to R. I. for two yean; and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default R. I. for six months, under each, for accepting illegal gratifiction of Rs. 200/- from Ashok Kumar Sharma (PW. 1), a Surveyor, in subdivision of the same department at Dhar.

( 2. ) ON 1-3-1981, Ashok Kumar submitted a written report (Ex. P. 1) to Superintendent of Police, Divisional Office of the Vigilance Board, Indore, to the effect that the appellant demanded bribe of Rs. 200/- for early payment of his bills. He directed Inspector Govind Rao Bhanwar (PW. 9) to take immediate action on the report according to law. The Inspector, along with the complainant, Dy. S. P. Nanawati (PW. 6) and other police personnel proceeded to Khandwa on 2-3-1981. On his application (Ex. P. 3), Dy. Collector Shri Krishna Chopre (PW. 10) joined to witness the trap. He also summoned Vishwas Khirwarkar (PW. 5) as a P
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top