SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(MP) 64

A.P.SEN, P.V.DIXIT
VIMALCHAND PRAKASHCHAND – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M.Mehta, K.K.DUBEY, V.S.Pandit,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) IN this reference under Section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, read with Section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Vimalchand Prakashchand, Sarafa, Ujjain, the questions propounded by the Sales Tax Tribunal for our decision are

(1) Whether in the facts and the circumstances of this case charges in respect of adat, dalali, bank commission, charity and insurance incurred by the assessee can be included in the sale price and be taxed at the hands of the assessee ? (2) Whether in the facts and the circumstances of the case an inference can be drawn that an implied contract existed for the sale of packing materials, i. e. , bardana and iron hoops, along with pressed cotton bales and the estimated price of the bardana could be included in the taxable turnover of the assessee holding that there was a sale of bardana ?

( 2. ) THE assessee is a dealer in cotton. During the period from 1st April, 1959, to 31st October, 1959, it sold, in the course of inter-State trade, compressed cotton in bales covered with hessian cloth and fastened with iron hoops. In the turnover of these inter-State sale transactions, the a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top