SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(MP) 189

S.M.N.RAINA
NARSINGH RAO – Appellant
Versus
SHANTABAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.GUPTA, P.W.Sasrabudhe,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is a second appeal by the defendants arising out of a suit for partition of a house.

( 2. ) PARTIES are inter-related being the descendants of the deceased Dhodiba, as would appear from the genealogical tree given below :-

( 3. ) DHODIBA had five sons, Baba Saheb, Amritrao, Yeshwantrao, Bala saheb and Baburao, the original Plaintiff in this case. Ali of them are now dead. Baba Saheb was the eldest son. Respondents No. 1 to 6 are the legal representatives of the deceased Baburao.

( 4. ) THE case of Baburao, the original plaintiff, as laid in the plaint, was that the parties were members of a joint Hindu family. The house in suit, bearing municipal No. 5/12, was the property of the joint family having been acquired by Dhodiba. The house has been in occupation of defendants No. 1 to 8, who are appellants in this case. As some of the defendants started making construction in the house in assertion of a hostile title in May 1962, Baburao instituted a suit for partition on 21-6-1962 claiming half share therein.

( 5. ) THE suit was resisted by the defendants appellants on a number of grounds. They denied that it was the self acquired property of Dhodiba and claimed to be
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top