SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(MP) 113

T.P.NAIK
Kalyandas Anantlal – Appellant
Versus
Gangabai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.CHOUBEY, P.S.KHIRVADKAR,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE order of this appeal shall also dispose of Misc. (Second) Appeal No. 40 of 1958 and Misc. (Second) Appeal No. 69 of 1958.

( 2. ) FOR understanding the question involved in the three appeals, a few facts relevant for the purpose may shortly be stated. Sunderlal and three others, plaintiffs Nos. 1 to 4, formed a Joint Hindu family. Kashiram, Champalal and Anant-lal (defendants Nos. 1 to 3) were members of another joint Hindu family. All the aforesaid members of the two joint families were partners in a partnership owning a Ginning and Pressing Factory at Khirkia (hereinafter called the partnership property ). In execution of a decree against the joint Hindu family consisting of Sunderlal and three others (plaintiffs Nos. 1 to 4), Gopaldas, Purshot-tam and Khatau (plaintiffs Nos. 5 to 7) purchased the Interest of Sunderlal and others in the partnership property. Thereafter, plaintiffs Nos. 5 to 7 as transferees of the interest of the first foui plaintiffs in the partnership property filed Civil Suit No. 10-B of 1940 for an account of profits of their transferors interest in the said property and for its payment to them. This suit failed because plaintiffs Nos. 1 to

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top