SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 634

G.D.SAXENA
Jitendra Vajpai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.D. Sharme for petitioners;
R.K. Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision petition under section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1974 preferred by the petitioner/accused is directed against an order dated 17th March 2011 passed in Sessions Case No. 21/2010 by the Special Judge (Dacoity), Bhind (M.P.), framing thereby the charges against the petitioners/accused for commission of offence punishable under section 394 read with section 397 of IPC, in alternative under sections 394 and 450 of IPC read with section 13 of the MPDVPK and in alternative under section 458 of IPC read with section 13 of the MPDVPK Act.

2. The facts in short, just for the decision of this petition are that on 1st January, 2010 at about 21.15 hours at Pustak Bazar Bhind, accused Jitendra Bajpai @ Kallu, Brajendra Bajpai @ Bantu along with two unknown persons went to the shop of complainant Raj Kumar Jain, on motorcycle and in a jeep and asked the complainant to handover vacant possession of the shop and house. When the complainant objected to it, they entered into his shop by breaking the lock open of the shutter and tried to forcibly occupy it. They also took the box kept in the shop having emergency Glass worth Rs. Twenty thousand. It is alleged that













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top