Dr. T. N. Singh, J.-- 1. Having entertained grave doubt about maintainability of the three letters Patent Appeals listed before us for admission and interim relief, we decided to hear counsel. Indeed, respondents having been noticed on the question of ad mission and having entered appearance, it was possible to hear their counsel who pressed vigorously the preliminary objection of maintainability of the appeals. We purpose to dispose of by this common order, all the three appeals-Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 5, 6 and 7 of 1987-as a common question arises in these appeals and we have taken the view that the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the appeals must prevail.

2. A learned Single Judge of this Court passed orders on 11-2-1987, separately, in three Misc. Civil Appeals wherein orders of learned District Judge passed in civil suits were challenged. Those orders were passed by learned District Judge on applications of plaintiffs made under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151, C. P. C., seeking appropriate directions against the defendants restraining them from doing certain acts pending disposal of the suits. Because the learned District Judge made certain dir