SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 228

S.R.WAGHMARE
Radheshyam – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Singh Sisodiya for petitioner; Suraj Sharma, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. By this revision petition under section 397 read with section 401 of the CrPC accused petitioner Radheshyam has challenged the order dated 2.3.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Neemuch in Sessions Trial No.60/2012 framing charges for offence under section 306 of the IPC against the petitioner.

2. Brief facts necessary for elucidation are that on 1.1.2011 Sarpanch Radheshyam of village Athawakala received an information that there was a dead body lying near the Balaji Temple near the Jungle. The body belongs to an un known male person and merg was registered at No.21/2011 under section 174 of the CrPC. The dead body was identified by the family members to be Kamlesh s/o Heeralal Sharma; aged 40 years, resident of Khajuria, police station Ratangarh, District Neemuch. The merg intimation upon being investigated, it was found that the deceased Kamlesh had a wife Bhanvaribai, son Sanjay, brother Nandkishore and cousin Prahalad Sharma and Gulab Gurjer. The deceased Kamlesh was a driver by profession and had a dispute with the owner of the truck Radheshyam (present petitioner). The quarrel arose between his employer and Kamlesh regarding the account at the petrol pump at Ra







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top