SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 469

SUSHMA SHRIVASTAVA
Devendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
L.N. Sakle for applicant; A.L. Patel, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Applicant has preferred this revision against the order dated 17.1.2006 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa (Fast Track Court) in ST No. 116/2005, whereby charges under sections 306 and 506 (Part II) have been framed against the applicant. Applicant, however, has mainly challenged the charge framed against him under section 306 of IPC.

2. Deceased Suresh committed suicide on 27.1.2005 at Village Ahmadpur, Khaigaon, District Khandwa leaving behind a suicide note indicating that the applicant was constantly harassing the deceased by giving threats to his life for last one month prior to the incident in order to recover the amount lent to him. On the basis of merg enquiry, an offence was registered against the applicant and was investigated and applicant was prosecuted under section 306 of IPC. On case being committed to the Court of Sessions, applicant was charged under sections 306 and 506B of IPC by the impugned order, which has been challenged in this revision.

3. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that even if the prosecution case is accepted in its entirety, no case for framing a charge under section 306 of IPC against the applicant is made out.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top