SANJAY YADAV
Geeta Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Besides assailing the proposed award dated 31-12-2005, by Collector (Land Acquisition), Bhopal, in Regular Land Acquisition Case No. l/A/82/95-96, petitioners also call in question the entire land acquisition proceedings initiated vide Notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published in the M.P. Rajpatra, dated 24-11-95. Notification under Section 6 of the Act was published in M.P. Rajpatra on 15-5-1998 (as per order passed in W.P. No. 4176/1998 deemed to have been published on 31-3-1998).
2. It is not in dispute that-
(i) The petitioners are members of Sarvodaya Housing Co-operative Society.
(ii) Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhopal vide its resolution dated 22-7-1987 sought 126.27 acres of land situated at Berasia Road and Karod Kalan, of which 103.96 acres was acquired on 30-11-1994.
(iii) Vide resolution dated 5-10-1995 acquired 28.71 acres of land which included the land belonging to society of which the petitioners are member.
(iv) Notification under Section 4(1) of Act, 1894 issued on 3-11-1995 was challenged by some of the members of Society, viz., Vijay Kumar and others Vs. State of M.P. andothers, W.P. No. 3195/1994; Ranjit Singh Thakur, vide
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action Vs. Union of India and others
Lok Sewa Shikshan Mandal Vs. A.R. Mundhada Charitable Trust and others
M. Ramalinga Thevar Vs. State of T.N.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Lichho Devi and others
S. Nagara (dead) by L.Rs. and others Vs. B.R. Vasudeva Murthy and others
State of U.P. and others Vs. Rajiv Gupta and another
Yusugbhai Noormohmed Nendoliya Vs. State of Gujarat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.