JUDGMENT

G.D. Saxena, J:- Having been aggrieved by the directions issue by the order dated 1/8/12 in Misc. Cri. Case No. 1430/2012 (Baijnath Singh Vs. State of M.P. & another) which are produced below, the petitioner has knocked the doors of this court with a request for exercising powers under section 482 of Cr.P.C. to secure the ends of justice:-

" Consequently, the impugned order dated 11/11/11 is quashed. The petition stands hereby allowed: The application filed on behalf of petitioner under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. is also allowed (which apparently by mistake or typographical error is mentioning the words " on behalf of the accused -petitioner", whereas it was filed by the interested party in trial against the accused - respondent No. 2, herein). It is directed that the learned I trial court shall summon the statements mentioned in the application filed by the petitioner through the Investigating Agency and thereafter proceed with the matter in accordance with law, without being influenced by any of the observations made during the course of this order."

2. In the present petition before this court, the petitioner prays for the reliefs as following:-

" It is therefore, most humbly pr