M.K.MUDGAL
Hetram – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.K. Mudgal, J.
With the consent of parties, the matter is being finally heard and the record perused.
1. The petitioner has filed this criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Cr.P.C being aggrieved by the order dated 20.06.2011 passed by the Court of II Additional Sessions Judge, Shivpuri in Sessions Trial No. 92/2011, whereby, the non-applicants No. 2 to 4/respondents No. 2 to 4 have been discharged from the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC.
2. The facts, in brief are that a criminal complaint was filed by petitioner-Hetram S/o Kallu Kushwah alleging that he was in possession of house No. 159 situated in ward No. 29, Peepal Wala Kua Shashipura, Mansha Kachi- Shivpuri, which was obtained by him after the death of his father, who had died on 21.02.1998, thereafter, tax of Rs. 1500/- was paid by him on 07.04.2004. However, the 2 non-applicant No. 2- Vijay Singh in connivance with Municipal Corporation, got his name mutated pertaining to a patore and a room in his name. The accused Vijay Singh got his name entered in the record of Municipal Corporation Shivpuri by fabricating a will and showing himself to be adopted son of decease
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.