K.K.TRIVEDI
Ramakant Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner ex-employee of the establishment of District and Sessions Judge, Satna, has assailed the order passed by the disciplinary authority, dismissing him from the service from the post of Executing Clerk and by subsequent orders dated 13-8-2008 and 16-7-2009 appeals preferred by the petitioner have been dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case, giving rise to filing of this petition are, the petitioner who was working in the establishment of District and Sessions Judge, Satna on the post of executing clerk at the relevant time was assigned the duty in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Satna. The petitioner was a reader assigned to look after the cases of jurisdiction. A list was made available to the petitioner by the Presiding Officer of the Court indicating that certain cases were to be withdrawn by the State Government and for the said purposes the application made by the State Government/prosecuting agency permission to withdraw the prosecution was granted. The petitioner was called upon to prepare the disposal of such cases and deposit the same in the record room of the Court. In on
Om Prakash Vs. State of U. P., AIR 1960 SC 409 (Paras 7
Jagdish Prasad Saxena Vs. State of Madhya Bharat (Now Madhya Pradesh), AIR 1961 SC 1070 (Paras 7
Union of India and another Vs. Tulsiram Patel, AIR 1985 SC 1416 (Paras 7
Chairman and Managing Director, VSP and others Vs. Gopa Raju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.