Back
SUJOY PAUL
Ashish Singh Bhadoriya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Sujoy Paul, J.:-
“Law has reached its finest moment when it has freed man from the unlimited discretion”. Since the Legislature has enacted the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the 'Act') and Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Extent of Wards) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter called as the “Rules”), petitioner, a citizen of Vidisha thought that said finest moment has reached and authorities are now bound to act in consonance and within the frame work of these provisions. The petitioner is aggrieved by notification dated 19.9.2014 (Annexure P/1) and prayed that it be set aside. A mandamus is prayed for to direct the respondents to undertake the exercise of determination of extent of wards afresh in accordance with the said rules. Lastly, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to follow the procedure as prescribed in Section 5-A of the Act.
2. The relief prayed for shows that grievance of the petitioner is of two fold. Firstly, it is contended that the notification dated 19.9.2014 is not in consonance with section 29 of the Act and rules 3,6,7 and 8 of the Rules. Relief 7(iii) is prayed for by contending that as per Section 5-A of the Act, the ultimate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
