G.S.SOLANKI
Dadu Kaushalendra Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Thakur Narayan Singh – Respondent
G.S. Solanki, J.
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 11.02.2005, passed by District Judge, Seoni, in civil suit No. 3-A/01, Defendant/Appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure
2. In short the Plaintiff/Respondent's case is that the Defendant/Appellant owing a shop in Seoni city which is situated in Block No. 49, Plot No. 209/5, area of 15.5" X 14" pakka construction along with the open plot of 12.5"X17.5" adjoining to backside of the shop, aforesaid shop and plot hereinafter to be referred as disputed property.
3. According to Plaintiff/Respondent, Defendant/Appellant executed an agreement to sale of disputed property on 21.06.2000 vide Ex. P/1 for the amount of Rs. 1,48,500/-, out of which Rs. 48,500/-was taken as an advance. As per terms of the agreement rest amount of Rs. 15,000/-will be paid on Dipawali, 2000 and the balance of Rs. 85,000/-to be paid up to 8.3.2001. Thereafter Defendant/Appellant will execute the registered sale deed in favour of Plaintiff/Respondent.
4. It was further pleaded that Defendant/Appellant had taken Rs. 5000/-on 18.7.2000 and Rs. 15,000/-on 13.10.2000, total Rs. 20,000/-as per terms of agreem
Bhagwan Singh Vs. Ramprasad 1993 MPWN 2
Bal Krishna and Anr. Vs. Bhagwan Das (dead) by L.Rs and Ors. (2008) 12 SCC 145
Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji Vs. Shri Sitaram Thapar AIR 1996 SC 2095
Pukhraj D. Jain Vs. G. Gopalakrishna. AIR 2004 SC 3504
Surya Narain Upadhyaya Vs. Ram Roop Pandey and Ors. AIR 1994 SC 105
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.