SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 1181

G.S.SOLANKI
Dadu Kaushalendra Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Thakur Narayan Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.S. Solanki, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 11.02.2005, passed by District Judge, Seoni, in civil suit No. 3-A/01, Defendant/Appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure

2. In short the Plaintiff/Respondent's case is that the Defendant/Appellant owing a shop in Seoni city which is situated in Block No. 49, Plot No. 209/5, area of 15.5" X 14" pakka construction along with the open plot of 12.5"X17.5" adjoining to backside of the shop, aforesaid shop and plot hereinafter to be referred as disputed property.

3. According to Plaintiff/Respondent, Defendant/Appellant executed an agreement to sale of disputed property on 21.06.2000 vide Ex. P/1 for the amount of Rs. 1,48,500/-, out of which Rs. 48,500/-was taken as an advance. As per terms of the agreement rest amount of Rs. 15,000/-will be paid on Dipawali, 2000 and the balance of Rs. 85,000/-to be paid up to 8.3.2001. Thereafter Defendant/Appellant will execute the registered sale deed in favour of Plaintiff/Respondent.

4. It was further pleaded that Defendant/Appellant had taken Rs. 5000/-on 18.7.2000 and Rs. 15,000/-on 13.10.2000, total Rs. 20,000/-as per terms of agreem



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top