SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 627

ROHIT ARYA
Mahendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Meera Bhargava – Respondent


Advocates:
Sumant Mishra for petitioner; Anand Bhardwaj for respondent No.1.

ORDER

1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 17.10.2012 passed by the trial Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under section 35 of the Stamp Act vide I.A. No.3.

2. Facts necessary for disposal of this petition are in narrow campass. Plaintiff /respondent has filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sale dated 10.12.2008.

3. Defendant filed an application under section 35 of the Stamp Act questioning the admissibility of the aforesaid agreement to sale on the premise that the instrument does not bear the stamp duty as payable in conveyance deed as the possession of the property was delivered by the instrument does not bear the stamp duty as payable in conveyance deed as the possession of the property was delivered by the instrument and therefore stamp duty was payable as per the market value of the property ans in absence where of the document was not admissible in evidence. Learned counsel relied upon judgment of Coordinate Bench












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top