SUJOY PAUL
Ramgopal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kamla Bai – Respondent
1. Challenge in this petition is made to the order dated 2.7.2014 (Annexure P-1), order dated 31.1.2005 (Annexure P-4) and order dated 6.6.2009 (Annexure P-6) passed by Board of Revenue, Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner respectively.
2. The parties have fought long drawn battle before the Revenue Courts. Shri Abhishek Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that Halkibai was the original owner of the land. The respondent No.1 is the daughter of Halkibai whereas petitioner is son of Parmanand who was brother of Halkibai. Kamlabai's name was mutated in the land record on 26.12.1991. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by said mutation, decided to challenge it because no notice was issued to petitioner before mutating the name of Kamlabai in the revenue record. On 28.7.1992 petitioner's name was mutated. Respondent filed an appeal against the said mutation order dated 28.7.1992 before the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO). The SDO dismissed the appeal on 28.3.1995. The respondent then preferred an appeal against the said order dated 28.3.1995 before Additional Commissioner, which was decided on 30.4.1997 (Annexure P-2). The Additional Commissioner remande
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.