SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 770

SUJOY PAUL
Ramgopal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kamla Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhishek Bhadoriya for petitioner; S. K. Shrivastava for respondent.

ORDER

1. Challenge in this petition is made to the order dated 2.7.2014 (Annexure P-1), order dated 31.1.2005 (Annexure P-4) and order dated 6.6.2009 (Annexure P-6) passed by Board of Revenue, Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner respectively.

2. The parties have fought long drawn battle before the Revenue Courts. Shri Abhishek Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that Halkibai was the original owner of the land. The respondent No.1 is the daughter of Halkibai whereas petitioner is son of Parmanand who was brother of Halkibai. Kamlabai's name was mutated in the land record on 26.12.1991. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by said mutation, decided to challenge it because no notice was issued to petitioner before mutating the name of Kamlabai in the revenue record. On 28.7.1992 petitioner's name was mutated. Respondent filed an appeal against the said mutation order dated 28.7.1992 before the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO). The SDO dismissed the appeal on 28.3.1995. The respondent then preferred an appeal against the said order dated 28.3.1995 before Additional Commissioner, which was decided on 30.4.1997 (Annexure P-2). The Additional Commissioner remande

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top