Back
SUJOY PAUL
Poonam Mansharamani (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Mansharamani – Respondent
1. The parties are at loggerheads on the validity of the order dated 31.7.2015, passed by the Sixteenth Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil Suit No.6-A/2014.
2. Draped in brevity, the facts are that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for possession based on title and mesne profit against the respondent-defendant. The respondent filed his written-statement and contested the suit. The petitioner then filed an application under Order 11 rules 1 and 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) dated 29.4.2015 (Annexure P-7). Along with the said application, the petitioner enclosed interrogatories. In turn, the respondent filed his reply on 1.7.2015 (Annexure P-8). The Court below rejected the aforesaid application (Annexure P-7) by impugned order dated 31.7.2015. This order is called in question in this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.
3. Shri Chhabra, learned counsel for the petitioner criticized the said order by contending that the application (Annexure P-7) was filed in order to elicit the admission from the defnedant to avoid the lengthy evidence and with a view to get expeditious disposal of the suit. The Court below has erred in rejecting the applicat
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
