SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 867

C.V.SIRPURKAR
Kujmati – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Agrawal for appellant;
Sushri Amrit Ruprah for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard on I.A.No.8460/2009 under section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 319 days in filing this miscellaneous appeal.

2. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that appellant Kujmati is widow of deceased Raghuwar who had died in a train accident while travelling from Allahabad to Chapa in Sarnath Express on 15.1.2004. The Railway Claims Tribunal Bhopal Bench, had allowed the claim under section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to in the order as “the Act”); and had awarded a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-. Being aggrieved by the quantum of the award, this miscellaneous appeal under section 23 of the Act, has been preferred.

3. It has been stated that as the appellant was not satisfied by the award passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 29.8.2008, shall handed over the copy of the award for necessary action to her counsel Shri Manishanker Sahu of Raigarh; however, since the formalities regarding vakalatnama and affidavit could not be completed by the appellant, the appeal could not be preferred within the stipulated period. Subsequently, the copy of the award got misplaced in the office of the advocate. Later on 25.7






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top