MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
P.K. Jaiswal and Alok Verma, JJ.
Modern Dental College and Research Center, Indore v. Government of India and others
Writ Petition No.5553 of 2015 (Indore) : against the order of renewal of permission for admitting 4th Batch of students; Decided on 14.3.2016.
Held : It very clear that the petitioner – Dental College is statutory obliged to have requisite infrastructure and facilities as per DCI norms, and also to apply to the Dental Council of India for such renewal well in advance for the next academic session. As per the provisions of section 10A(1)(b)(ii) of the Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993, no persons, no authority and institutions can increase its admission capacity in any course of study or training. Writ Petition (S) Civil No.76/2015 and (2011)4 SCC 623 referred to. (2005)2 SCC 65 and (1984)1 SCC 307 followed.
nar fpfdRld vf/kfu;e] 1948 && /kkjk 10d] 10¼2½] 10d¼4½ rFkk 20 && nar fpfdRld ¼la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 1993 && /kkjk 10d¼1½¼[k½¼2½] 10[k¼3½] 10[k rFkk 16d && fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ vf/kfu;e] 1956 && /kkjk 10d && 'kS{kf.kd l= 2015&16 ds fy, Nk=ksa dh prqFkZ Vksyh dks izos'k nsus dh vuqKk ds uohdj.k ds fy, ;kfpdk && tks fd izR;FkhZ Ø-4 }kjk tkjh dh xbZ fo'ofo|ky; lac}rk && fofu;eu] 2006 }kjk fofgr le; lhek ds Hkhrj ugha nsus ds dkj.k [kkfjt dh xbZ && ;kph egkfo|ky; Mh lh vkbZ lfu;e ds vuqlkj vis{k.kh; volajpuk rFkk lqfo/kk,a j[kus ds fy, ck/; gS rFkk ,sls uohdj.k ds fy, vxys 'kS{kf.kd l= ds fy, vfxze vkosnu djus ds fy, Hkh ck/; gS && dksbZ O;fDr izkf/kdkjh ;k laLFkk v/;;u ;k izf'k{k.k ds fdlh Hkh Øe esa bldh HkrhZ {kerk dks c<+k ugha ldrk && ;kph egkfo|ky; 'kq} g`n; efLr"d ;k gkFkksa ls ugha vk;k rFkk fcuk dqN fNik, lHkh rF; vkxs ugha j[ks && ;kph fdlh oSosdh; jkgr ds fy, gdnkj ugha rFkk uk gh vk{ksfir vkns'k dks vfHk[kafMr djkus ds fy, gdnkj gS && ;kfpdk [kkfjtA
vfHkfu/kkZfjr % ;g cgqr Li"V gS fd ;kph egkfo|ky; Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ ds fu;e ds vuqlkj vis{k.kh; volajpuk rFkk lqfo/kk,a j[kus ds fy, rFkk ,sls uohdj.k ds fy, vfxze 'kS{kf.kd l= ds fy, Hkkjrh; nar fpfdRlk ifj"kn~ dks vfxze vkosnu djus ds fy, Hkh ck/; gSA nar fpfdRld ¼la'kks/ku½ vfèkfu;e] 1993 dh /kkjk 10d¼1½¼[k½¼2½ ds mica/kksa ds vuqlkj dksbZ O;fDr] izkf/kdkjh rFkk laLFkk fdlh Hkh v/;;u ;k izf'k{k.k ds Øe esa bldh HkrhZ {kerk dks c<+k ugha ldrkA fjV ;kfpdk ¼,l½ flfoy Ø-76@2015 rFkk ¼2011½ 4 ,l lh lh 623 fufnZ"VA ¼2005½ 2 ,l lh lh 65 rFkk ¼1984½ 1 ,l lh lh 307 vuqlfjrA
Jaiswal, J. 1. The Petitioner Dental College has filed this writ petition, as a second round of litigation, challenging the order dated 31.7.2015 (Annexure P-36), passed by the respondent No.1 whereby, the respondent No.1, rejected the renewal of permission for admitting 4th Batch of students in the specialty of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics from 3 to 6 and Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry from 4 to 6 seats for the Academic Year 2015-16 on account of non – furnishing of a University Affiliation issued by respondent No.4 – Medical University within the time framed prescribed by Dental Council of India Regulation, 2006.
2. In the earlier round of litigation, the petitioner – Dental College aggrieved by the recommendation dated 28.2.2015 of the respondent No.2 and consequent decision dated 31.3.2015 taken by the respondent No.1, filed a Writ Petition No.2398/2015 before this Court. The Division Bench of this Court vide it’s order dated 7.5.2016, disposed of the writ petition. The operative para 22 of the order dated 7.5.2012 reads as under :
“22.From the aforesaid, in our considered view,the impugned order passed by respondents No.1 and 2 on 31.03.2015 (Annexure P-28) and 28.2.2015 (Annexure P-22) cannot be sustained. Therefore, the same are hereby quashed; however, with liberty to the Central Government to pass a fresh order, after giving opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Dental Council of India is also directed to consider the case of the petitioner and submit its recommendations, in accordance with law, to the Central Government. The competent authority of the Central Government shall give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then shall take appropriate decision regarding renewal of permission of fourth batch for MDS Course in Orthodontics and Paedodontics, as early as possible, within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order.”
3. The BDS degree and the MDS degree in various specialities in respect of the students of the petitioner – Dental College awarded by Devi Ahilya Vishwavidhyalaya, Indore is recognized under section 10(2) of the Dentists Act, 1948 and the petitioner dental college is under statutory obligation to have full complement of staff, equipment and other infrastructure facilities including University affiliation prescribed for under – graduate training programme and also to have additional requirements in respect of funds or allocation of finances, staff and other infrastructure facilities as per the norms prescribed by the Council and approved by the Central Government under section 20 of the Dentists Act, 1948, in the revised MDS Course Regulations, 2007, Post Graduate Diploma Course Regulations, 2008 and policy framed and declared from time to time. The last date of sending the recommendation by the DCI to the Government of India was 28.2.2015. The petitioner – Dental College furnished its University affiliation dated 27.2.2014 issued by the respondent No.4 – Medical University to Union of India only on 18.3.2015, by that time, the last date for sending appropriate recommendation by the DCI was already over.
4. For the academic year 2015 – 16, Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (s) (Civil) No.76/2015 Ashish Ranjan and others v. Union of India and others, has extended the time for admission in PG Medical / DE Course till 10th June, 2015. Relevant part of the order dated 24.03.2015 reads as follows :
“In course of hearing a chart has been given indicating the time schedule for the medical/dental admission for the academic year 2015-16. It reads as follows:-
“Proposed Postgraduate Medical/Dental Admission Schedule
(For Academic Year 2015-16)
Schedule for admission
Conduct of entrance examination
Declaration of result of qualifying examination/ entrance examination.
1st round of counselli
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.