SHUBHADA R.WAGHMARE
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Shrimant Tukojirao Panwar – Respondent
1. By this second appeal appellant/State is aggrieved by the judgment dated 06.07.2006 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Dewas in Civil First Appeal No. 13-A/06 dismissing the appeal on ground of limitation.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the order dated 28.02.2003 was passed by the Revenue Authority Dewas in Revenue Case No. 2/A-1/2001-2002 concerning land survey No. 293 area 5.30 acre situated in Ganji Compound, Dewas. The respondent Shrimant Tukojirao Panwar had filed a suit under Section 57(3) of Land Revenue Code before the II Civil Judge Class-II, Dewas for declaration and permanent injunction against the State Government, claiming the land on his owner ship and that he was in possession for more than 65 years and had acquired Bhumi Swami rights. The State filed the written statement before the trial Court and denied the right of the plaintiff respondent and submitted that the land belonged to the State Government and was recorded in the Revenue record as Nazul Land and after coming to the force that MP Land Revenue Code the land vested in the State Government and the plaintiff respondent had no right title over the same and it also challeng
Special Tehsildar, Land Acquisition, Kerala vs. K.V. Ayisumma
State of Karnataka vs. Y. Moideen Kunhi (dead) By LRs. and Others
Lanka Venkateswarlu (Dead) vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.