SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 643

S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Raghuraj – Appellant
Versus
Ramprakash – Respondent


Advocates:
Pratip Visoriya for petitioner;
R.K. Soni for respondent.

ORDER

1. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.4.2014 passed by the Civil Judge, Class II, Seondha District Datia (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.61-A/2012 whereby the application under Order 23 rule 1 CPC has been dismissed seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh.

2. The facts in nutshell are that the petitioner-plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Since there was defect of non-joinder of necessary party and due to lack of certain pleadings, the petitioner moved an application under Order 23 rule 1 CPC. The learned trial Court dismissed the application on the ground that defect of non-joinder of party is not a formal defect and lack of pleading cannot be a ground for granting the permission to withdraw the suit with the liberty to file fresh suit.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial Court without considering the relevant provisions contained in Order 23 rule 1 CPC has rejected the application which is dehors the provisions of law.

4. Order XXIII rule 1 CPC makes provisions for withdrawal of the suit. Sub-rule (3) of rule 1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top