Vivek Rusia, J.

The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 13.03.2014, by which the dealership of the petitioner was terminated and order dated 17.12.2014, by which the appellate authority has dismissed the appeal.

Facts of the case are as under:

1. That the petitioner was appointed as retail outlet dealer for sale of petrol and high speed diesel by the respondent/Indian Oil Corporation (herein after in short "IOCL"), vide agreement dated 21.11.2008. The petitioner was awarded by a certificate in the year 2011 for earning maximum number of fuel revenue.

2. That in the year 2012, a machine named as "MIDCO S.No.1136 Midko 980 C" was installed in the petitioner's pump by way of transfer from M/s. Digendra Fuel & Service Station petrol pump. The said machine was installed on "as it is" basis. The verification report was prepared on 11.10.2012. At the time of installation, the reading of meter of machine was 2808681.

3. The officers of the respondent company conducted random investigation on 08.02.2013 and 11.07.2013 and found no violation of Marketing Discipline Guideline 2013. Thereafter, another investigation was conducted within a month on 21.