VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Ramswaroop Kumhar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India the legality and validity of the order dated 07.03.2006 passed by the Chairman State Industrial Court, Indore (M.P.) is under challenge whereby the petitioner has been punished with an order for compulsory retirement after the departmental enquiry.
2. Succinctly, the necessary facts for adjudication of the present case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year, 1977 as a Lower Division Clerk and was posted in Labour Court, Shahdol. He was promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk in the year, 1989, thereafter he was again promoted to the post of Head Clerk and was transferred to Labour Court, Ambikapur in the year, 1998.
3. At the time of bifurcation of the State of Madhya Pradesh, the petitioner was posted at Ambikapur which was within the territorial jurisdiction of the State of Chhatisgarh. The petitioner was finally allocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh and he was transferred from State of Chhatisgarh by order dated 05.04.2003 and by the same order he was relieved. A departmental enquiry was initiated against the petitioner and it was mentioned in the said or
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India
Chandra Kumar Choupra v. Union of India
Commandant, 22nd Battalion Central Reserve Police Force, Srinagar v. Surinder Kumar
Delhi Police through Commissioner of Police v. Sat Narayan Kaushik
Rajendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State Bank of India v. Ramlal Bhaskar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.