SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 388

SUJOY PAUL
Prakash Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Ankit Saxena, Advocate
For the Respondents: Shri Pushpendra Yadav, G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Sujoy Paul, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.10.2016 Annexure P/8 in this petition whereby the respondents have rejected the representation of the petitioner dated 30.8.2016.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner's date of birth was mentioned in the service record as 7.7.1964. However, said date of birth of the petitioner was altered by the respondents as 7.7.1955 in the year 2014. This action came to be challenged in WP No.10381/2015 which was decided by this Court on 6.8.2015 Annexure P/3. The action of respondents in unilaterally altering the date of birth of the petitioner was disapproved. The department was directed to issue show cause notice to the petitioner. In turn, the petitioner was permitted to file reply. The department was given liberty to pass a final order after following the principles of natural justice. The department thereafter passed the order dated 10.9.2015 which was again challenged by the petitioner by filing WP No.18129/2015 Annexure P/4. Since no show cause notice was issued and action in altering the date of birth was approved, this court again set aside the said order dated 10.9.2015 and gave liberty to the d



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top