SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 300

VIVEK RUSIA
Gyanchand Ramrakhyani – Appellant
Versus
Navdeep Khera – Respondent


Advocates:
S.C. Bagadiya with S.V. Vyas for petitioners.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. The petitioners/defendants have filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 16.2.2018 by which application filed by the plaintiff under Order 26 rule 9 of the CPC filed by the plaintiff has been allowed by the learned civil Court.

3. The plaintiff/respondent No. 1 filed the Civil Suit No. 264-A/2004 against mother, brother and sister for the relief of permanent injunction of 6.11.2004. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed another suit under section 307 (5) of M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, seeking removal of the illegal construction raised by defendants No. 2 to 4/present petitioners. During pendency of the plaint on 19.8.2009, the plaintiff moved an application under Order 26 rule 9 of the CPC for appointment of commission to make a local investigation. The defendants opposed the said application and vide order dated 15.12.2009, the learned trial Court has dismissed the application. Thereafter, suit proceeded and after framing of the issues plaintiff and defendants examined their witnesses and thereafter the case was fixed for final argument on 12.10.2017. On the date, the plaintiff again an application under Order 26 rule

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top