SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 346

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Karelal – Appellant
Versus
Gyanbai Widow of Keshari Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
K. S. Tomar with J. S. Kaurav for appellants.

JUDGMENT

1. This common judgment shall dispose of both the Second Appeals No. 436/2002 and 434/2002.

2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and decree dated 1.8.2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ganj Basoda District Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 6-A/2002 and Civil Appeal No. 8-A/2002, by which the appeal filed by appellants Karelal and others was dismissed by the Appellate Court, whereas the appeal filed by respondent No. 1 Gyanbai was allowed by the appellate Court.

3. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present appeals, in short, are that the respondents namely Gyanbai, Rekhabai, Gayatribai and Rajbai filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction on the ground that joint Hindu Family Properly of the plaintiffs and the defendants is situated in village Pawai Tahsil Basoda District Vidisha, which includes Khasra Nos. 46, 70, 100, 101, 123, 152, 213, 215, 242, 256, 257, 258, 277, 278, 279, 286, 306, 333, 335, 336, 338, 339, 340, 342, 349, 343, 457, ad-measuring area 22.616 hectares, in which the defendant No. 1 Narayan Singh and defendant No. 2 Karelal have equal share. It was further pleaded that on 18.6.1997, the plaintiffs obtained the c


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top