SANJAY YADAV
Ganeshi Bai W/o Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
SANJAY YADAV, J.
1. Shri Dayaram Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Heard on admission.
3. Petitioner takes exception to the order dated 24.8.2016 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Gotegaon, district Narsinghpur; whereby, the Election Petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 122 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 against the election of respondent No. 2 as Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Muoar, Janpad Panchayat Gotegaon has been dismissed for non-compliance of Rule 7 of Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995, as the petitioner instead of depositing the security amount of Rs. 500/- with the Prescribed Authority deposited through challan in the Bank.
4. Rule 7 of 1995 Rules envisages:
"7. Deposit of security. - At the time of presentation of an election petition, the petitioner shall deposit with the specified officer a sum of Rs. Five Hundred as security. Where the election of more than one candidate is called in question, a separate deposit of an equivalent amount shall be required in respect of each such returned candidates."
5. Rule 8 of the Rules 1995 provides for t
Babulal Kaliram Kirar and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.