SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 993

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
JAHANGEER ALVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri Jayant Neekhra, Advocate
For the Respondent: Shri Puneet Shroti, Panel Lawyer

ORDER :

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J.

1. In the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order of externment passed under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 [for brevity 'the Act'] by the District Magistrate, Hoshangabad and also the order passed by the Commissioner, Narmadapuram Division, Hoshangabad, respondent No.2, dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the said order.

2. On 2-6-2016 notices were issued to the respondents and the counsel appearing for the State was directed to seek instructions in the matter. On 8-11-2016 counsel for the respondents sought for two weeks time to file reply and he was directed to keep the relevant records available before the Court on the next date. Again, on 29- 11-2016 time was prayed for on behalf of the respondents. On 6-12- 2016 again time was sought for by the respondents. Thereafter on 8-12-2016 the matter was fixed in the week commencing 19-12-2016 to enable the counsel for the respondents to file



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top