Prakash Shrivastava, J.:-

Shri Umesh Gajankush learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Neelam Abhyankar, learned counsel for the respondent/State.

Heard finally with consent.

This writ petition has been filed by petitioner challenging the order dated 2-4-2014, Annexure P-3, passed by District Magistrate in respect of externment of petitioner from District Dhar and adjoining districts for a period of six months and also the order dated 15-5-2014 passed by Commissioner rejecting the appeal.

2. In brief, the petitioner who is the resident of Pithampur District Dhar was served with the notice dated 7-11-2013 initiating the proceedings for externment under M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for short the Act). The petitioner had filed reply dated 13-11-2013. Thereafter the impugned order of externment dated 2-4-2014 under section 5(a)(b) and 6(c) of the Act was passed by the District Magistrate which has been confirmed in appeal.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner challenging the impugned order submits that petitioner is a representative of workers union and cases were registered against the petitioner at the behest of management. He has submitted that out of seven cases on which r