Back
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Ramgopal Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Prakash Shrivastava, J.:-
Shri Umesh Gajankush learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Neelam Abhyankar, learned counsel for the respondent/State.
Heard finally with consent.
This writ petition has been filed by petitioner challenging the order dated 2-4-2014, Annexure P-3, passed by District Magistrate in respect of externment of petitioner from District Dhar and adjoining districts for a period of six months and also the order dated 15-5-2014 passed by Commissioner rejecting the appeal.
2. In brief, the petitioner who is the resident of Pithampur District Dhar was served with the notice dated 7-11-2013 initiating the proceedings for externment under M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for short the Act). The petitioner had filed reply dated 13-11-2013. Thereafter the impugned order of externment dated 2-4-2014 under section 5(a)(b) and 6(c) of the Act was passed by the District Magistrate which has been confirmed in appeal.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner challenging the impugned order submits that petitioner is a representative of workers union and cases were registered against the petitioner at the behest of management. He has submitted that out of seven cases on which r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
