S.P.KHARE
WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. , PATHAKHERA – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR, BETUL – Respondent
S.P. Khare, J.
This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demand notice dated 25-7-1996 (Annexure A-1) and the recovery certificate dated 27-6-1998 (Annexure A-2) for payment of Rs. 73,70,003/- as terminal tax.
The petitioner is a Government Company. It is extracting coal from the Pathkhera coal mines and selling it. It is within the municipal limits of respondent No. 2 Municipal Council Sarani. Terminal tax has been imposed by this Municipality u/s 127(l)(xvi) of the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) on the export of goods from its limits after its proposal was sanctioned by the State Government as per notification published in the Official Gazette on 26-4-1991. Item No. 6 of the Schedule of the articles is "Coal" and the rate of tax on this is 2% of its value. The respondent No. 2 by the impugned notice is demanding terminal tax for the period 16-9-1991 to 16-9-1995.
The petitioner's case is that terminal tax cannot be levied on the export of coal from the municipal limits. Further, the petitioner is selling the coal at the pit-head of the colliery and it is the purchasers of coal who are exporting it
India Cement Ltd. and Others Vs. State Of Tamil Nadu and Others
State of U.P. and Another Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and Another
Smt. Meera Khandelwal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.