MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
S.K. Kulshrestha, J; D.M. Dharmadhikari, J
TULSIRAM JATAV – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND OTHERS – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4881 of 1999
Decided on : 17-12-1999
D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.
This petition shall decide the batch of connected petitions numbers W.P. 4882/99 (M.P. Singh v. Union of India and others) W.P. 4883/99, (Sudhir Ku. Sharma v. Union of India and others) W.P. 4905/99, (Kewal Kumar Bhalla and others v. Union of India and others) W.P. 4909/99, (R.D. Namdeo and another v. Union of India and others W.P. 49-13/99 (Dr. Mueen Ansari and Anr. v. The State of M.P. and others) W.P. 4914/99, (Vishnu Dubey v. The State of M.P. and others) W.P. 4916/99, (Anis Ahmad Siddiqui v. Union of India and others W.P.4917/99 (Rajendra Awasthy v. State of M.P.) W.P. 5011/99, (Deepak Kumar Soni v. Union of India and others) W.P. 5057/99, (Vireendra Kumar Rai v. The State of M.P. and others) W.P. 5062/99, (Vyas Kashyap v. Union of India and others) W.P. 5058/99, (Yadu Nath Singh v. State of M.P. and others) W.P. 5059/99, (Bhajan Lai Sharma v. The State of M.P. and others) W.P. 5060/99, (Raman Popali v. State of M.P. and others) and W.P. 4855/99 (Ghanshyam Jamanani v. State of M.P.), which were heard analogously.
In all these petitions the petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the provisions of the State legislation contain in M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 and M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to shortly as the 'Corporation Act' and the 'Municipalities Act' respectively) whereby for the ensuing elections to the local bodies i.e. Corporation, Municipality and Nagar Panchayats provision have been made for reservation of seats in different wards of the Municipal Area and for Chair-persons in different percentages in favour of Scheduled Castes, Tribes Other Backward Classes, women from the reserved category and women from general category.
In order to appreciate the nature of challenge made to the provisions in the two enactments containing the policy of reservations in favour of reserved categories of candidates for the election to the local bodies, it is necessary to examine the relevant provision of the Constitution and the provisions of the Act and the Rules under the two enactments in which reservations have been provided for different categories of candidates.
By the Constitution (Seventy Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 in the Constitution of India Part IX A was inserted to provide a uniform basis in all the States throughout India for Constitution of Local Self Governments in Urban Areas called as Municipal Corporation, Municipal Councils or Nagar Panchayats. A brief survey of Constitutional provisions is necessary to assess merit if any in the challenge made to the State Legislations for which the source of power derived from Part IXA of the Constitution. Article 243-P of the Constitution contains definition clauses in which under Sub Clause (e) 'Municipality' is defined as meaning "an institution of self-government constituted under Article 243-Q". In Article 243-Q the Local Self Government Institutions are described as Nagar Panchayat "for a transitional area, that is to say, an area in transition from a rural area to an urban area". Municipal Council for a smaller urban area and Municipal Corporation for a larger urban area. The other definition clause is Sub-clause (g) of Article 243-P which defines 'Population' as under -
(g) 'Population' means the population as ascertained at the last preceding census of which the relevant figures have been published.
The last census in India was done in the year 1991 and the next census is now due only in the year 2001.
Article 243-R provides for composition of Municipalities by election to the seats to be carved out on the basis of territorial constituencies in the municipal area meaning the territorial area of a municipality or the local self Government institution being the Corporation, Municipality or Nagar Panchayats as the case may be.
Article 243-T contains the provision for reservation of seats in favour of Scheduled Castes, Tribes Women and Other backward Classes. Article 243-T needs full reproduction as its prov
Anugrah Narain Singh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others
N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency and Others
Indra Sawhney etc. etc Vs. Union of India and others, etc. etc.
Azimunissa and Others Vs. The Deputy Custodian, Evacuee Properties, District Deoria and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.