SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DIXIT
Narwarsingh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Narwarsingh, Applicant, in person

ORDER :

In this application Thakur Narwarsingh who along with some other persons is being tried by Mr. H. B. Agarwal, Special Magistrate, for offences under Ss. 395, 397, 398, 120-B, 460, 332, 149, 458, I. P. C. The applicant complains that the Ruler of Zabua, under whose instigation cases relating to the above offences have been instituted against him, resides in Indore and is influencing the prosecution witnesses against him and that the witnesses which he himself wishes to produce in defence are residents of Zabua and Zaknawada which places are at a considerable distance from Indore, and further says that his trial in the Indore Central Jail premises is likely to prejudice him. On these grounds the applicant prays that his trial should be held either at Dhar at Ujjain and that in no case should it be held in the Jail premises.

2. I have heard the petitioner who was present in person, and the learned Government Advocate. In my opinion the application must be refused. It is not the allegation of the applicant that Mr. Agarwal, the Special Magistrate, is prejudiced against him and the applicant does not ask for a transfer of the cases pending against him from Mr. Agarwal's court to a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top