Back
SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Jaisingh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. This order disposes of criminal revision filed by the applicant Jaisingh s/o Dheeraj Rajput under sections 397 r/w 401 of CrPC, which has been preferred against the order of First Additional Sessions Judge, Jhabua pronounced on 13.2.2019 in Criminal Appeal No. 172/2015, whereby order of conviction and sentence pronounced by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhabua on 29.9.2015 in Criminal Case No.1496/2015 convicting the applicant under sections 34(1)(a) read with 34(2) of the M. P. Excise Act and sentenced him to undergo 1 year RI with fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to suffer additional 3 months SI has been affirmed, thereby dismissing the appeal.
2. The prosecution case in short was that on 21.9.2012, pursuant to receipt of secret information, one Maruti Suzuki Car bearing registration No. MP09 A 1644 was intercepted by the officers of the Excise Department and two persons namely, applicant Jaisingh and one another co-accused Sonu was found sitting in the car and on searching the car, 207.36 bulk litres of liquor was recovered from the car. The case was registered and after investigation, which comprised analysis of seized liquor and collecting othe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
