SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 276

S.K.SETH, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Prabhat Kumar Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Shyam Yadav for appellant.

JUDGMENT

Shukla, J.--

1. Heard on I. A. No. 2161/2019, which is an application for condonation of delay of 215 days in filing the present writ appeal. It is stated in the application that after the order dated 13.4.2018 passed by the learned Single Bench dismissing the writ petition (W. P. No. 19334/2013), the petitioner/appellant preferred a review petition (R. P. No. 867/2018) which was also dismissed on 23.1.2019. Thus, the appellant was prosecuting the remedy of appeal and the delay caused in filing the present appeal is bonafide.

2. Considering the averments made in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the I. A. No. 2161/2019 is allowed and the delay in filing the writ appeal is condoned.

3. Also heard on admission.

4. The present intra-Court appeal takes an exception to the order passed by the learned Single Bench in W. P. No. 19334/2013 and also the order dated 23.1.2019 passed in the review petition. The appellant-petitioner filed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to correct the date of birth of the writ petitioner in his service record according to his Higher Secondary School Certifi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top