IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
Anand Pathak, J.
Gopal Gupta – Petitioner
Versus
Central Narcotics Bureau, Morar, Gwalior – Respondent
M.Cr.C. No. 2155 of 2017
Decided On : 29-11-2018
NDPS Act - Quashment of FIR - Sections 8, 21, 28, 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly sections 8, 21, 28, and 29. The court highlighted the definitions and implications of illicit trafficking, possession, transportation, sale, and purchase of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances under these sections. The court also emphasized the importance of compliance with license conditions and the applicability of the NDPS Act over the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was found in possession of a large quantity of Phensedyl Syrup, a pharmaceutical preparation containing Codeine phosphate, without proper documentation or license. The Central Bureau of Narcotics seized the syrup and filed a private complaint against the petitioner under sections 8, 21, 28, and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner challenged the FIR and subsequent charge-sheet, claiming that the syrup did not fall under the NDPS Act's provisions due to its codeine concentration and that he held the necessary licenses.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's possession of the Phensedyl Syrup without proper documentation and the denial of transactions by alleged purchasers raised suspicions of illicit trafficking. The court emphasized the importance of complying with the NDPS Act and the rules made thereunder, dismissing the petitioner's argument that his possession was for medicinal or therapeutic purposes.
Issues: The issues revolved around the legality of the petitioner's possession of Phensedyl Syrup, the applicability of the NDPS Act, and the compliance with license conditions. The court also addressed the scope of section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the disputed questions of facts in the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation and application of the NDPS Act, particularly sections 8, 21, 28, and 29, in relation to the petitioner's possession of Phensedyl Syrup. The court emphasized the need for compliance with license conditions and the prevalence of the NDPS Act over the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitioner's plea for quashing the FIR and private complaint, stating that the mixed question of facts and law cannot be decided based on mere pleadings. The court held that the petitioner failed to prove his innocence or truth through evidence and pleadings, and therefore, no interference was warranted.
JUDGMENT :
With consent, heard finally.
The present petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been preferred by the petitioner for quashment of FIR No. 2/2017 dated 19-1- 2017, registered under section 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act 1985 (hereinafter referred as “NDPS Act”), by the Central Bureau of Narcotics, Morar, Gwalior and all consequential proceedings. Later on, although the petitioner placed the charge-sheet filed by the respondent by way of private complaint, but pleadings remained the same, without any amendment.
2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that on the basis of secret information, Officer of Central Bureau of Narcotics (hereinafter referred as “CBN”) seized about 76,200 bottles of Phensedyl Syrup (Cough Syrup) 100 ml. each on 20-1-2017 from the garage of the residence of petitioner situate at Ravi Nagar Gwalior. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was unable to show any license/document to validate possession of pharmaceutical preparation containing Codeine phosphate which is a narcotic drug. Later on, private complaint was filed by the respondent/CBN under sections 8, 21, 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act and it was referred in the complaint that with the name of M/s Pharma Traders, Hujrat Kotwali, Gwalior illicit trafficking and transportation of Phensedyl Syrup to North East States were conducted. On the tip off of secret information, inquiry conducted and found that only with the name of Pharma Agency, a shop was operated.
3. Thereafter, it was found that the person at the helm was Rajendra Bandil, who represented himself as Manager and on search, 150 cartons of Phensedyl Syrup was found and he could not able to give the details of sale and purchase of the goods. On inquiry, he admitted that he is the Manager and Proprietor is Smt. Anita Gupta. Thereafter, computers of Pharma Agencies were seized and on analysis, it was found that a large quantity of Phensedyl Syrup was sold on 1-4-2016 to 5-8-2016 to the different agencies at Delhi, Kolkata and Gwalior and when those agencies at Delhi, Kolkata and Gwalior were inquired then they categorically denied the purchase of said Phensedyl Syrup. Out of six firms, Abhay Traders, Delhi, Tara Medical Agency, Kolkata and Galav Pharmaceutical, Gwalior were the firms who denied the purchase of said Phensedyl Syrup and K.D.M. Enterprises, Gwalior was found to be run by Rajendra Bandil and Global Marketing, Gwalior was run in the name of petitioner’s son and company Pharma Sales was run in the name of father of petitioner.
4. Thereafter, on a tip off, on 19-1-2017, Inspector, Central Bureau of Narcotics, Gwalior raided the house of petitioner. Initially the petitioner did not come out from his house, then police protection was taken and he was apprised by the consequences orally from outside then he opened the door and in his presence, search was conducted in the basement of his residence where about 76,200 bottles of Phensedyl Syrup have been seized. Thereafter, FIR was registered under the provisions of NDPS Act. The seven distributors of the said product gave the statement under section 67 of NDPS Act and admitted the fact that said batch of Phensrdyl Syrup was not sold to Pharma Agencies and some of the distributors, as referred in the complaint, despite issuing summons did not appear and submit the information as sought by the department. Remaining distributor Pharma Traders Morena is owned by proprietor Gopal Gupta petitioner himself, he did not file any document in support of his submission regarding purchase of the Phensedyl Syrup. The search conducted on 19-1-2017 and at that time Gopal Gupta denied that any license is possessed by him, but later on he produced a license dated 15-2-2016 in which proprietor of the firm Global Marketing is his son Ritik Gupta and the competent person to take care of the drugs was Rajesh Gupta who happens to be the co-brother of Gopal Gupta and he denied regarding exis
Arvind Chandwani vs. State of M.P.)
Baljeet Singh vs. Union of India (NCB)
Kanhaiyalal vs. Union of India
Kurukshetra University vs. State of Haryana
Laxmi Medical Agency Vs. State of Madhay Pradesh
Pankaj Shukla vs. UOI and others
Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India and others
S. Krishnamoorthy vs. Chellammal
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others
State of Uttaranchal vs. Rajesh Kumar Gupta
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.