ORDER

1. Heard on admission.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articled 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 4.1.2019 passed in MACC No. 369/2014 by the 7th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satna whereby the petitioner's application filed under Order 22 rule 3 of CPC to implead her and her minor children of the original claimant Rajendra Dahiya has been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the accident in the present case took place on 12.8.2013 whereby the original claimant Rajendra Dahiya had suffered various injuries and even according to his claim application before the Claims Tribunal, he has averred having suffered various fractures and other injuries as a result of which he became bedridden and also suffered from bed sore. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that during the pendency of the aforesaid claim case, the original claimant Rajendra Dahiya passed away on 27.7.2018 and hence an application under Order 22 rule 3 of CPC was filed before the learned Claims Tribunal to bring his legal representatives on record, as the deceased is survived by his wife and two minor childr