Pinki Asati vs State Of M. P. And Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(MP) 132

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Pinki Asati – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. And Others – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Suyas Mohan Guru, Advocate, Kailash Chandra Ghildiyal, Advocate, Manas Mani Verma, Advocate, Amit Seth, Advocate, Bramha Nand Pandey, Advocate, Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate, Jubin Prasad, Advocate, Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate, L.C. Patne, Advocate, Swapnil Ganguly, Advocate, Brijesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Ashish Choubey, Advocate, Brijendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Praveen Kumar Pandey, Advocate, Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate, Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Amit Khatri, Advocate, Anshuman Singh, Advocate, Chandra Kant Patne, Advocate, Harshmeet Hora, Advocate, Pawan Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate, Nitin Singh Bhati, Advocate, Gopi Chourasiya, Advocate, Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate, Brahmendra Prasad Pathak, Advocate, Himanshu Mishra, Advocate, Prashant Singh, Advocate, Anshul Tiwari, Advocate, Shobha Menon, Advocate, Rahul Choubey, Advocate, Naman Nagrath, Advocate, Akash Choudhary, Advocate, Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate, A.S. Raizada, Advocate, Manish Kholia, Advocate, Shivam Mishra, Advocate, Aditya Narayan Shukla, Advocate, Kabeer Paul, Advocate, Parag S Chaturvedi, Advocate, Pramod Kumar Thakre, Advocate, Rahul Rawat, Advocate, Ashish Shroti, Advocate, Vibudhendra Mishra, Advocate, K.S. Jha, Advocate, Rakesh Pandey, Advocate, Avinash Zarger, Advocate, Himanshu Chouhan, Advocate, Bharat Kumar Dubey, Advocate, Kamalnath Nayak, Advocate, Saurabh Singh Sengar, Advocate

Table of Content
1. legality of obc candidates migrating to general category (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. horizontal reservations must be strictly enforced (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 33)
3. supreme court verdicts support strict adherence to reservation rules (Para 11 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 27)
4. vertical vs horizontal reservation clarified (Para 25 , 35 , 38)
5. court quashes illegal list, mandates fresh allotment based on rules (Para 39 , 40 , 43)

JUDGMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. - In this batch of writ petitions, invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have assailed the legality of the revised Select List issued by the M.P. Public Service Commission, Indore [for short, "the MPPSC"], whereby private respondents, who submitted their candidature against reserved category in Other Backward Class Female (OBCF) for the post of Assistant Professors in different subjects, have been selected and allotted Unreserved Female (UNRF) posts/seats, however the petitioners have been kept in waiting list denying selection. Thus, in the obtaining factual matrix, the petitioners have agitated their grievance in the present batch of writ petitions, wherein the following issu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(MP) 132

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAPinki Asati – AppellantVersusState Of M. P. And Others – Respondent

Cases Referred (12)

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Pinki Asati – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. And Others – Respondent