ANAND PATHAK
Balveer Singh Bundela – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anand Pathak, J. - This is first bail application preferred by the applicant under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. wherein he is apprehending his arrest in a case registered vide Crime No.448/2019 at Police Station Vishwavidyalaya, District Gwalior for alleged offence punishable under Sections 376, 386, 506 of IPC.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the applicant that police has registered a false case against him. As per FIR, date of incident appears to be 27-10-2019 whereas FIR lodged on 15-12-2019, apparently delayed in nature. Applicant and prosecutrix entered into wedlock through Hindu rites and rituals and copy of marriage certificate and photographs in this regard are attached with the application.
3. As per allegations on the pretext of marriage, alleged rape has been committed by applicant. Some amount has been transferred in favour of the prosecutrix by the applicant which reveals that both were in relationship. Even otherwise, on the pretext of marriage if physical intimacy developed then the same does not constitute offence of rape. In support of his submission, he relied upon the judgments of Apex Court in the case of Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of
Adri Dharam Das vs. State of West Bengal
Bharat Chaudhary and another vs. State of Bihar and another
Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia etc. vs. The State of Punjab
Jabalpur Bus Operators Association vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
KTMS Abdul Kader vs. Union of India
Lavesh vs. State (NCT Of Delhi)
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Ravindra Saxena vs. State of Rajasthan
Salauddin Abdulsamad Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra
State of M.P. vs. Pradeep Sharma
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.