SHEEL NAGU, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Mahabir Prasad Jain And Others : H. d. Joshi And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - This order shall govern the disposal of Misc. Criminal Case No. 1257/2020 (Mahabir Prasad Jain and Others vs. State of MP) and Misc. Criminal Case No. 2844/2020 (H.D. Joshi and Another vs. State of MP), as both the petitions are filed for getting similar relief.
2. Misc. Cri. Case No. 1257/2020 has been filed against the order dated 14.11.2019 and Misc. Cri. Case No. 2844/2020 has been filed against the order dated 13.3.2019, both passed by Special Judge under Prevention of Corruption Act, Gwalior in Case No. 03/2020 SST. By both impugned orders the applications filed by the petitioners for their discharge for want of sanction have been rejected.
3. Facts of the case, in short, are that a criminal case has been registered against the officers of Harsi High Level Sindh Project Phase-II of Government of M.P. and also against the officers of LNU/Federation of State of MP on the allegation of financial irregularity during the period between 2006 to 2010 and Crime No. 29/2009 was registered. In FIR the allegations were made with regard to corruption in purchase, supply and erection of material/apparatus by officers of aforesaid Project for getting
Baijnath Gupta vs. State of MP
C.R. Bansi vs. State of Maharashtra
Kalicharan Mahapatra vs. State of Orissa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.