VIVEK RUSIA
Sabbir Khan (Deceased) through L. Rs. Habib Khan – Appellant
Versus
Sher Mohmmad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This is an second appeal filed under section 100 of the C.P.C. by the defendants against the judgment & decree dated 19.2.1996 passed by Civil Judge, Class-II, Khategaon in Civil Suit No.68-A/1980 and judgment & decree dated 18.7.2001 passed by Addl. District Judge, Kannod, District Dewas in Civil Regular Appeal No.92-A/1996.
2. Facts of the case, in short, are as under :
Thereafter, dispute arose between his wife and mother; therefore, he was separated from the family by his father hence he shifted to Harangaon along with his family. In the year 1953, he purchased the land bearing Survey No.245, 246, 247, 248, 251, 252, 253 and 254 total area 7.523 Hect. (Hereinafter referred to as “the suit property”) from Nandu Maharaj in Rs.1,500/-. He got the sale-deed registered in the name of his father – defendant No.1 and also got mutated his father's name in the revenue record
Bhura Mogiya V/s. Statish Pagariya : (2001) 9 SCC 385
Gurudwara Saheb V/s. Gram Panchayat Village Sirthala : (2014) 1 SCC 669
Hemaji Waghaji Jat V/s. Bhikhabhai : (2009) 16 SCC 517
Krishnamurthy V/s. O.V. Narasimha Setty : (2007) 3 SCC 569
K. Muthuswami V/s. N. Palaniappa : AIR 1998 SC 3118
Lisamma V/s. Karthiayani : (2015) 11 SCC 782
R. Rajagopal Reddy V/s. Padmini Chandrasekhran : AIR 1996 SC 238
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.