Purushottam @ Pappu vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(MP) 631

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Purushottam @ Pappu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shri R.K.S. Kushwah, Shri Vinay Kumar, Shri Purushottam Rai, adv

JUDGMENT :

By a common order, all the three appeals shall be decided as they arise out of the same incident. Since, Ghanshyam and Preetam Dhakad were absconding and were arrested at a later stage, therefore, they have been convicted by separate judgments and sentences.

2. These Criminal Appeals have been filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C.

3. Cr.A. No. 552 of 2015 has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 27-3-2015 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in S.T. No. 26/2014.

4. Cr.A. No. 1297 of 2015 has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 29-7-2017 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in S.T. No. 26/2014.

5. Cr.A. No. 552 of 2015 has been filed against the judgment and sentence dated 12-5-2015 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in S.T. No. 26/2014.

6. All the appellants have been convicted for the following offences :

1	Under Section 452 of I.P.C.	7 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 2000 in default 2 months R.I.
2	Under Section 394/397 IPC	10 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 1000 in default 1 month R.I.

7. The prosecution stor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(MP) 631

G.S.AHLUWALIAPurushottam @ Pappu – AppellantVersusState of M. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (20)

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Purushottam @ Pappu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent