SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 554

RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Bhupendra Suryawanshi – Appellant
Versus
Sai Traders – Respondent


Advocates:
Ankit Saxena for petitioner, Mr. Sunali Parrache for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 20.05.2019 in case No. SC NIA 158/2018 passed by learned JMFC Narsinghpur whereby the learned JMFC has framed the charge under section 138 N.I. Act against the petitioner.

2. According to case, respondent is a trade firm and filed a complaint through its proprietor against the petitioner who is the chairman of company namely ‘Well Built Industry India Ltd., Kalyan Pura, Ashta, District-Sehore’. It is mentioned in the complaint that on account of business relation between the parties, the petitioner borrowed money of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the respondent on 14.08.2016. He assured the respondent to return the same within a period of four months. But, after expiry of stipulated period, when the respondent demanded his money, the petitioner started procrastinating and after insisting, the petitioner has given a cheque No. 000051 dated 25.11.2017 amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- to the respondent. On 18.1.2018, when the respondent submitted the said cheque before the bank, same was dishonoured due to “stop payment” by the petitioner. Thereafter, the respondent sent a legal notice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top