SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 411

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Mandir Shri Mahader Ji, Chimak – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S. K. Jain for petitioners; H. D. Mishra, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Heard finally. By this common order, WP 160/2017, WP 161/2017, WP 524/2017, WP 3353/2019, WP 18724/2019 and WP 17845/2019 shall be decided.

2. For the sake of convenience, the facts of W.P. No. 160/2017 shall be taken into consideration.

3. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :

''7.A. That, a direction may kindly be issued against the respondents not to constitute any committee for managing the temples which is contrary to the many direction issued by the Hon'ble High Court;

B. deleted by order dated 27.2.2017;

C. That, press note which was illegally published by the Collector Gwalior Annexure P-3 may also be quashed.

D. Respondent Collector may be directed to implead the name of Pujari in Khasra papers.

E. Any other relief which is just and proper may also be given;

F. That, the order (Annexure P-12) passed by the Collector, Gwalior is illegal and contrary to law, hence same may kindly be quashed.''

4. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present petition in short are that the petitioners claim themselves to be the Pujaris of Mandir Shri Mahadev Ji, Mandir Shri Jayashwar Mahadev Ji

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top