ORDER

Shrivastava, J. --

1. This review petition is preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 4.10.2019 passed in W.P. No. 20404/2019. In the said writ petition, the following reliefs were sought:-

^^11-1 ;g fd] 'kkldh; Hkwfe ekStk xzke txukiqjk rglhy Xokfy;j ftyk Xokfy;j ¼eŒÁŒ½ fLFkr Hkwfe losZ Øekad 187] 183] 491] 492] 481] 482] 483] 485] 487] 488] 489] 490] 494] 498] 499] 500] 501] 502] 503] 524] dqy fdrk 19 dqy jdok 19 ch?kk 17 fcLok fefly canks cLr lEcr 1997 esa dkye ucaj 6 esa ekQh vkfr;sa ljdkj ntZ gSa fu'khFk dqekj eksnh }kjk izLrqr caVokjsa dk vkosnu tks vij rglhynkj o`Rr cgksM+kiqj Xokfy;j Ádj.k Øekad 9@v&27@2019&20 ds ;gka is'k fd;k gSa mDr tufgr ;kfpdk ds le{k fopkjk/khu Ádj.k Øekad 9@v&27@2019&20 dks vkxkeh dk;Zokgh djus ls jksdk tkuk U;k;ksfpr gksxkA

11-2 ;g fd] mDr Hkwfe;ka ekQh vkSdkQ ljdkjh ds :i ntZ gSa blfy;s ;kfpdk Øekad 1425@2010 ,oa 1428@2010 t; flag vkfn fo:) fu'khFk dqekj eksnh esa ikfjr ,dy ihB dk vkns'k fnukad 7-03-2014 dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh d`ik djsaA

11-3 ;g fd ;kfpdkdrkZ ekuuh; U;k;ky; ls ÁkFkZuk djrk gSa fd mDr Ádj.k esa dh xbZ nks"kiw.kZ dk;Zokgh esa nks"kh O;fDr;ksa ds fo:) mfpr dk;Zokgh fd;s tkus dk funsZ'k@vkns'k ikfjr djus dh d`ik djsa ,oa Hkw&ekfQk;ksa ds fo:) dBksj n.MkRed dk;Zokgh o vFkZn.M vkjksfir djus dh d`ik djsaA

11-4 ;g fd ;kfpdkdrkZ ekuuh; U;k;ky; ls ÁkFkZuk djrk gSa fd mijksDr lgk;rk ds vkykok U;k;fgr ,oa tufgr esa ;kfpdkdrkZ dks tks Hkh mfpr lgk;rk fnyk;k tkuk mfpr le>sa fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k Ánku djus dh d`ik djsaA

11-5 ;g fd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; Xokfy;j [k.MihB Xokfy;j ¼eŒÁŒ½ }kjk leku rF; gksrs gq;s tufgr ;kfpdk Øekad 8540@ 2015 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ lehj flag ,oa vU; fo:) e/; Áns'k ,oa vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23 tuojh 2019 ds vuqlkj ÁLrqr tufgr ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh xbZ gSa pawfd mDr ÁLrqr tufgr ;kfpdk Hkh jketkudh eafnj dh ekQh vkSdkQ 'kkldh; Hkwfe gSa vkSj ifjfLFkfr leku gSa QdZ flQZ mDr Ádj.k esa i{kdkj iwoZ U;k;ewfrZ gSa ftUgksaus vius ÁHkko dk nq:i;ksx dj eafnj jketkudh dh Hkwfe dks fu;ksftr "kM;a= ls gM+ius dk dk;Z fd;k gSa tks orZeku esa Á;kljr gSaA**

2. It is observed in the impugned order that the record reveals that earlier the land in question was subject matter of dispute in W.P No. 1425/2010 and W.P. No. 1428/2010 and the writ petitions were disposed of by two separate orders passed on 7.3.2014 in the following terms :

“Before preceding further, I would like to produce here the prayer Clause of the subsequent compromise application of I.A. No. 2469/14 in which the prayer made in the earlier application (I.A. No. 1034/14) is stated in explanatory manner. The same is as under:

^^1- fd mi;qZDr Hkwfe losZ Øekad 187@2 esa ls jdck 1-055 gsŒ esa ls 2 ch?kk 15 foLok] losZ Øekad 183 jdck 3 foLok] losZ Øekad 491 ,oa 492 esa ls 120 xq.kk 20 QhV vFkkZr 2400 oxZQqV jdck 0-052 gSDVs;j esa ls 0-021 gSDVs;j vFkkZr 2 foLok ;ksx 3 ch?kk ij fjLiksMsUV Øekad 2 ds uke ukekarj.k fd; tkus dk vkns'k Ánku fd;k tk;A

2- fd blh Ádkj losZ Øekad 187@1 jdck 1-003 gsŒ esa ls 3 ch?kk 13 foLok ij ;kfpdkdrkZ Øekad 2 ds LFkku ij fjLiksMsUV Øekad 2 ds uke LFkkukUrj.k fd;s tkus dk vkns'k Ánku fd;k tk,A

3- fd] mi;qZDr Hkwfe;ksa ds vfrfjDr losZ Øekad 481 jdck 13 foLok Hkwfe ÁR;kFkhZ Øekad 2 ds LoRo LokfeRo ,oa vkf/kiR; dh Hkwfe ij ;kfpdkdrkZ Øekad 2 ds uke dk ukekUrj.k fd;s tkus ckor~ vkns'k Ánku fd;k tk,A

4- fd] rglhynkj] Xokfy;j dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkosa fd jkthukesa ds eqrkfcd vfHkys[k esa fu;r vof/k esa ukekadu vafdr djs ,oa fofËkor iVokjh ds ek/;e ls lhekadu djkosaA

5- fd] tks Hkh U;k;kfpr lgk;rk gks Ánku dh tk,A^^

In view of the aforesaid, both the compromise applications (I.A.1034/14 & I.A.2469/14), are allowed and as per terms and conditions of these compromise applications, this petition is disposed of.

In order to avoid future complications between the parties aforesaid both the applications of compromise, in which the terms & conditions of the compromise are mentioned, and it's annexed trace map, are made the part and parcel of this order. While enforcing this order in future if any difficulty